satire canterbury tales essay

eyewear business plan ideas

Skip to main content. Location New York, United States. Salary Salary Not Specified. Posted Jul 13,

Satire canterbury tales essay cheap business plan ghostwriting services for university

Satire canterbury tales essay

Chaucer wrote the Canterbury Tales to try to point out to the people what they needed to fix. These stories both have an underlying theme hinting at the idea that women are temptresses and that they were oppressed in the church during that time. Chaucer used satire to hint at this theme throughout both of these tales.

Write my paper. It does have a moral in the story. The satire in this story was used to point out the oppression of women in the church. In the story, Chanticleer and Pertelote are the main characters. During the story they argue over the meaning of dreams Chanticleer thinks they are real and trusts that whatever happens in the dream will come true. Pertelote thinks they do not mean anything, they are just simply dreams. Chanticleer decides to trust Pertelote.

Later in the story a clever fox, Russel, comes into the yard one night. In the morning Chanticleer sees that the fox is watching him. When he goes to run the fox starts to flatter him. Chanticleer was distracted and the fox grabbed his throat. Ultimately in the end Chanticleer got away. He learned that he should not trust anyone that tries to flatter him. This all goes back to when he trusted Pertelote on the opinion that dreams mean nothing. Because he trusted Pertelote and almost got killed, this hints at the fact that people at that time did not trust women and thought they knew nothing.

This story hints at that underlying theme by using satire. This is shown in the story by the wife of bath being able to speak freely about matters. She even qualifies herself as an expert in matters of love. In the days of Chaucer, they did not trust women. They saw women as temptresses.

They did not see women as equal in a marriage. This statement implies that the men were happy when their wives submit to them and do whatever they want their wives to do. This theory, however, was becoming progressively corrupted as hypocrisy began to pollute the Church, particularly at the higher levels. Chaucer recognized this degradation of religious ideals. He exposes this in his prologue by skillfully and subtly satirizing the religious figures.

Using a unique view of 'Chaucer the Pilgrim' to describe them, he points out that certain characters are not as they should be. Chaucer does not criticize them openly, however. Chaucer simply emphasizes qualities that, although favorable to the character's general personality, are not consistent with the expectations of their position.

Chaucer highlights characteristics in these figures that portray them as good people, but calls attention to the fact that they do not act in a religious manner. Chaucer does respect the fact, however, that some degree of virtue remains in the church. This is represented by the Parson, who was "a holy-minded man of good renown," "first following the word before he taught it.

Chaucer clearly presents the corruption and hypocrisy in the Church through his descriptions of the Monk, Friar, and Pardoner. Chaucer tells about the characters of these men as they truly are, yet he makes sure to include a few satirical remarks about each man that shows Chaucer's disgust at how the men of the Church act. Chaucer makes it quite clear to the reader that these men boast about the high morals of the Church, and then proceed to live in stark contrast to nearly every one of these morals.

One example is how the Church preaches a solemn vow of chastity. Another aspect of the Church that these "holy-men" prove inconsistent is the vow of simple living.


Consider, that cheap phd essay editing for hire usa topic