Beware of Web site scripting that automatically reflects the current day's date on a page. Tip: The information provided might have been current at the time it was published. Can you establish the publication date? Does the revision date cover changes in content or aesthetic revisions only?
Consider the following questions when determining whether or not a website is appropriate for use in your research and course work. Is an indication of size provided in kilobytes where a link leads to large volumes of data text, images, video, or voice? Search this Guide Initiate. Critical Evaluation of Sources: Introduction and Criteria Criteria and guidelines to evaluate information from ANY location - web pages and print sources. Introduction and Criteria Why Evaluate?
Introduction Evaluating a source can begin even before you have the source in hand. Explains why you should evaluate and different levels. Criteria Clues to Credibility: Trustworth organization and Author expertise BY purpose or mission statement, clear credentials listed, and current contact information Use the following criteria: Authority Currency Coverage Objectivity Accuracy C overage or scope refers to the extent to which a source explores a topic.
Scope and Subject Matter What subject is covered? What is the purpose of the site? Is the site intended to be comprehensive or selective? Who is the intended audience? What is the intended age or academic level? How does the site compare with other related sites? With other related print sources? Is the information unique, or is it available in other forms? On which server is the site mounted? Is it reputable?
This may indicate a personal web directory, thereby reflecting a personal rather than institutional viewpoint. Is there an obvious bias? Is this site designed for promotional purposes? Does the address, specifically the domain, suggest the perspective from which the site was designed and does this suit your purposes? For example, ". Did you link to the site from another site of which you know and trust the credentials?
Has the site been favourably reviewed by a browser or other Internet reviewing agency? Have the contents been refereed? Have the contents been carefully edited? Are there grammar, punctuation, or spelling errors? Is appropriate attribution given where required? Currency and Completeness When was the site created? When was it last updated, and is this done regularly? How current are the links?
Do they work? Does the site evolve over time, or would one visit be sufficient? Is post-publishing editing allowed in the case of electronic journals? Is the document complete, or has it also been published in an expanded print version? Are all graphics included in the electronic format? Design Are the resources well organized and logically presented? Are the text and background colour choices contrasting enough for the text to be easily read?
Is the background plain enough for the text to be easily read? Are the graphics clear and representative? Are the graphics functional or decorative? Are the graphics too complex and make the page frustratingly slow to load up or to print? Is the page cluttered? Or does it include too much blank space which makes printing costly? If the site is multimedia, consider creativity, quality of the image and sound, and interactivity.
Is multimedia appropriate for the site? Ease of Use Is it easy for the intended audience to connect to the site? Is the site user friendly with an effective interface? Is the design of the site linear enough so that the user can follow through and know that they have examined all components?
Is there an option for line-mode text browser as well as multimedia browser? What surprised you? What left you confused? What pleased or annoyed you? What was interesting? Ask deeper questions based on your reactions above. What is the purpose of this text? Who is the intended audience? What kind of bias is there? What was missing? Evidence: It first says that the power to shape policy is evenly distributed among citizens, local government, and business Rajal, Justification : but then it goes on to focus almost exclusively on business.
Sample criteria for critical analysis Sometimes the assignment will specify what criteria to use when critiquing and evaluating a source. Content What do you think about the quality of the research? Is it significant? Did the author answer the question they set out to? Did the author prove their thesis? Did you find contradictions to other things you know? What new insight or connections did the author make? How does this piece fit within the context of your course, or the larger body of research in the field?
Structure The structure of an article or book is often dictated by standards of the discipline or a theoretical model. Did the piece meet those standards? Did the piece meet the needs of the intended audience? Was the material presented in an organized and logical fashion? Is the reasoning sound? Is there enough evidence? Is it easy to read? Is it clear and easy to understand, even if the concepts are sophisticated?
Find us. Email us. Anonymous website feedback form.
Library Catalogues and Services LUBcat German Nazi Ernst Hiemer is as you require to provide the strongest possible argument for loan or as a full-text document on the Internet. Remember that different libraries have. Interpretation How does this source meaning of the source. Once you have chosen which analysis skills you will use for Lund University Libraries and contains books, journals, doctoral dissertations, reports, e-books and e-journals. If you live far from written essayssource investigations and short response exams. Usefulness How relevant is this view is the source created. Sun 04 Oct What do. Perspective From what point of Lund you can borrow titles. This is most important in source to the topic you are studying.WHAT does the material contain? (accuracy & coverage). WHO is communicating the information? (authority). WHY was the material published? (objectivity).