phd dissertation wiki

eyewear business plan ideas

Skip to main content. Location New York, United States. Salary Salary Not Specified. Posted Jul 13,

Phd dissertation wiki political theory dissertation ideas

Phd dissertation wiki

Des, MTech, M. Des also involves submission of dissertation. In all the cases, the dissertation can be extended for summer internship at certain research and development organizations or also as PhD synopsis. In Indonesia, the term thesis is used specifically to refer to master's theses. The undergraduate thesis is called skripsi , while the doctoral dissertation is called disertasi.

In general, those three terms are usually called as tugas akhir final assignment , which is mandatory for the completion of a degree. Undergraduate students usually begin to write their final assignment in their third, fourth or fifth enrollment year, depends on the requirements of their respective disciplines and universities.

In some universities, students are required to write a proposal skripsi or proposal tesis thesis proposal before they could write their final assignment. If the thesis proposal is considered to fulfill the qualification by the academic examiners, students then may proceed to write their final assignment.

Most of the norms and rules of writing a thesis or a dissertation are influenced by the French higher education system. In Italy there are normally three types of thesis. Thesis requirements vary greatly between degrees and disciplines, ranging from as low as 3—4 ECTS credits to more than Thesis work is mandatory for the completion of a degree.

Malaysian universities often follow the British model for dissertations and degrees. However, a few universities follow the United States model for theses and dissertations. Branch campuses of British, Australian and Middle East universities in Malaysia use the respective models of the home campuses. In Pakistan, at undergraduate level the thesis is usually called final year project, as it is completed in the senior year of the degree, the name project usually implies that the work carried out is less extensive than a thesis and bears lesser credit hours too.

The undergraduate level project is presented through an elaborate written report and a presentation to the advisor, a board of faculty members and students. At graduate level however, i. A written report and a public thesis defense is mandatory, in the presence of a board of senior researchers, consisting of members from an outside organization or a university. A PhD candidate is supposed to accomplish extensive research work to fulfill the dissertation requirements with international publications being a mandatory requirement.

The defense of the research work is done publicly. However, in Philippine English , the term doctorate is typically replaced with doctoral as in the case of "doctoral dissertation" , though in official documentation the former is still used. The Philippine system is influenced by American collegiate system, in that it requires a research project to be submitted before being allowed to write a thesis.

This project is mostly given as a prerequisite writing course to the actual thesis and is accomplished in the term period before; supervision is provided by one professor assigned to a class. This project is later to be presented in front of an academic panel, often the entire faculty of an academic department, with their recommendations contributing to the acceptance, revision, or rejection of the initial topic.

In addition, the presentation of the research project will help the candidate choose their primary thesis adviser. An undergraduate thesis is completed in the final year of the degree alongside existing seminar lecture or laboratory courses, and is often divided into two presentations: proposal and thesis presentations though this varies across universities , whereas a master thesis or doctorate dissertation is accomplished in the last term alone and is defended once. In most universities, a thesis is required for the bestowment of a degree to a candidate alongside a number of units earned throughout their academic period of stay, though for practice and skills-based degrees a practicum and a written report can be achieved instead.

The examination board often consists of 3 to 5 examiners, often professors in a university with a Masters or PhD degree depending on the university's examination rules. Required word length, complexity, and contribution to scholarship varies widely across universities in the country. The academic dissertation for a PhD is called a dysertacja or praca doktorska. The submission for the Habilitation is called praca habilitacyjna or dysertacja habilitacyjna. Thus the term dysertacja is reserved for PhD and Habilitation degrees.

All the theses need to be "defended" by the author during a special examination for the given degree. Examinations for PhD and Habilitation degrees are public. The defense is done in a public presentation in which teachers, students, and the general public can participate.

For the PhD, a thesis tese is presented for defense in a public exam. The exam typically extends over 3 hours. The examination board typically involves 5 to 6 scholars including the advisor or other experts with a PhD degree generally at least half of them must be external to the university where the candidate defends the thesis, but it may depend on the University. In Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, and Ukraine an academic dissertation or thesis is called what can be literally translated as a "master's degree work" thesis , whereas the word dissertation is reserved for doctoral theses Candidate of Sciences.

To complete a master's degree, a student is required to write a thesis and to then defend the work publicly. The length of this manuscript usually is given in page count and depends upon educational institution, its departments, faculties, and fields of study [ citation needed ]. At universities in Slovenia, an academic thesis called diploma thesis is a prerequisite for completing undergraduate studies.

The thesis used to be 40—60 pages long, but has been reduced to 20—30 pages in new Bologna process programmes. To complete Master's studies, a candidate must write magistrsko delo Master's thesis that is longer and more detailed than the undergraduate thesis. The required submission for the doctorate is called doktorska disertacija doctoral dissertation. In pre Bologna programmes students were able to skip the preparation and presentation of a Master's thesis and continue straightforward towards doctorate.

In Sweden, there are different types of theses. The undergraduate theses are called uppsats "essay" , sometimes examensarbete , especially at technical programmes. After that there are two types of post graduate theses: licentiate thesis licentiatuppsats and PhD dissertation doktorsavhandling.

A licentiate degree is approximately "half a PhD" in terms of the size and scope of the thesis. Swedish PhD studies should in theory last for four years, including course work and thesis work, but as many PhD students also teach, the PhD often takes longer to complete.

The thesis can be written as a monograph or as a compilation thesis ; in the latter case, the introductory chapters are called the kappa literally "coat". Outside the academic community, the terms thesis and dissertation are interchangeable. A wide range of supervisory arrangements can be found in the British academy, from single supervisors more usual for undergraduate and Masters level work to supervisory teams of up to three supervisors.

In teams, there will often be a Director of Studies, usually someone with broader experience perhaps having passed some threshold of successful supervisions. The Director may be involved with regular supervision along with the other supervisors, or may have more of an oversight role, with the other supervisors taking on the more day-to-day responsibilities of supervision.

In some U. At most universities, dissertation is the term for the required submission for the doctorate, and thesis refers only to the master's degree requirement. Thesis is also used to describe a cumulative project for a bachelor's degree and is more common at selective colleges and universities, or for those seeking admittance to graduate school or to obtain an honors academic designation.

These projects are called "senior projects" or "senior theses"; they are generally done in the senior year near graduation after having completed other courses, the independent study period, and the internship or student teaching period the completion of most of the requirements before the writing of the paper ensures adequate knowledge and aptitude for the challenge. Unlike a dissertation or master's thesis, they are not as long and they do not require a novel contribution to knowledge or even a very narrow focus on a set subtopic.

Like them, they can be lengthy and require months of work, they require supervision by at least one professor adviser, they must be focused on a certain area of knowledge, and they must use an appreciable amount of scholarly citations.

They may or may not be defended before a committee but usually are not; there is generally no preceding examination before the writing of the paper, except for at very few colleges. Because of the nature of the graduate thesis or dissertation having to be more narrow and more novel, the result of original research, these usually have a smaller proportion of the work that is cited from other sources, though the fact that they are lengthier may mean they still have total citations.

Specific undergraduate courses, especially writing-intensive courses or courses taken by upperclassmen, may also require one or more extensive written assignments referred to variously as theses, essays, or papers.

Increasingly, high schools are requiring students to complete a senior project or senior thesis on a chosen topic during the final year as a prerequisite for graduation. The extended essay component of the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme , offered in a growing number of American high schools, is another example of this trend. Generally speaking, a dissertation is judged as to whether it makes an original and unique contribution to scholarship.

Lesser projects a master's thesis, for example are judged by whether they demonstrate mastery of available scholarship in the presentation of an idea. The required complexity or quality of research of a thesis may vary significantly among universities or programs. One of the requirements for certain advanced degrees is often an oral examination called a viva voce examination or just viva in the UK and certain other English-speaking countries.

This examination normally occurs after the dissertation is finished but before it is submitted to the university, and may comprise a presentation often public by the student and questions posed by an examining committee or jury. In North America, an initial oral examination in the field of specialization may take place just before the student settles down to work on the dissertation. An additional oral exam may take place after the dissertation is completed and is known as a thesis defense or dissertation defense , which at some universities may be a mere formality and at others may result in the student being required to make significant revisions.

The result of the examination may be given immediately following deliberation by the examination committee in which case the candidate may immediately be considered to have received their degree , or at a later date, in which case the examiners may prepare a defense report that is forwarded to a Board or Committee of Postgraduate Studies, which then officially recommends the candidate for the degree. At most North American institutions the latter two verdicts are extremely rare, for two reasons.

First, to obtain the status of doctoral candidates, graduate students typically pass a qualifying examination or comprehensive examination, which often includes an oral defense. Students who pass the qualifying examination are deemed capable of completing scholarly work independently and are allowed to proceed with working on a dissertation. Second, since the thesis supervisor and the other members of the advisory committee will normally have reviewed the thesis extensively before recommending the student to proceed to the defense, such an outcome would be regarded as a major failure not only on the part of the candidate but also by the candidate's supervisor who should have recognized the substandard quality of the dissertation long before the defense was allowed to take place.

It is also fairly rare for a thesis to be accepted without any revisions; the most common outcome of a defense is for the examiners to specify minor revisions which the candidate typically completes in a few days or weeks.

At universities on the British pattern it is not uncommon for theses at the viva stage to be subject to major revisions in which a substantial rewrite is required, sometimes followed by a new viva. Very rarely, the thesis may be awarded the lesser degree of M. Phil Master of Philosophy instead, preventing the candidate from resubmitting the thesis. In Australia, doctoral theses are usually examined by three examiners although some, like the Australian Catholic University and the University of New South Wales , have shifted to using only two examiners; without a live defense except in extremely rare exceptions.

In the case of a master's degree by research the thesis is usually examined by only two examiners. Typically one of these examiners will be from within the candidate's own department; the other s will usually be from other universities and often from overseas. Following submission of the thesis, copies are sent by mail to examiners and then reports sent back to the institution.

Similar to a master's degree by research thesis, a thesis for the research component of a master's degree by coursework is also usually examined by two examiners, one from the candidate's department and one from another university.

For an Honours year, which is a fourth year in addition to the usual three-year bachelor's degree, the thesis is also examined by two examiners, though both are usually from the candidate's own department. Honours and Master's theses sometimes require an oral defense before they are accepted. In Germany, a thesis is usually examined with an oral examination. This applies to almost all Diplom , Magister , master's and doctoral degrees as well as to most bachelor's degrees. However, a process that allows for revisions of the thesis is usually only implemented for doctoral degrees.

There are several different kinds of oral examinations used in practice. The Disputation , also called Verteidigung "defense" , is usually public at least to members of the university and is focused on the topic of the thesis. In contrast, the Rigorosum is not held in public and also encompasses fields in addition to the topic of the thesis. The Rigorosum is only common for doctoral degrees. Another term for an oral examination is Kolloquium , which generally refers to a usually public scientific discussion and is often used synonymously with Verteidigung.

In each case, what exactly is expected differs between universities and between faculties. Some universities also demand a combination of several of these forms. Like the British model, the PhD or MPhil student is required to submit their theses or dissertation for examination by two or three examiners. The first examiner is from the university concerned, the second examiner is from another local university and the third examiner is from a suitable foreign university usually from Commonwealth countries.

The choice of examiners must be approved by the university senate. In some public universities, a PhD or MPhil candidate may also have to show a number publications in peer reviewed academic journals as part of the requirement. An oral viva is conducted after the examiners have submitted their reports to the university. The oral viva session is attended by the Oral Viva chairman, a rapporteur with a PhD qualification, the first examiner, the second examiner and sometimes the third examiner.

Branch campuses of British, Australian and Middle East universities in Malaysia use the respective models of the home campuses to examine their PhD or MPhil candidates. In the Philippines, a thesis is followed by an oral defense.

In most universities, this applies to all bachelor, master, and doctorate degrees. However, the oral defense is held in once per semester usually in the middle or by the end with a presentation of revisions so-called "plenary presentation" at the end of each semester. The oral defense is typically not held in public for bachelor and master oral defenses, however a colloquium is held for doctorate degrees. In North America, the thesis defense or oral defense is the final examination for doctoral candidates, and sometimes for master's candidates.

The examining committee normally consists of the thesis committee, usually a given number of professors mainly from the student's university plus their primary supervisor, an external examiner someone not otherwise connected to the university , and a chair person. Each committee member will have been given a completed copy of the dissertation prior to the defense, and will come prepared to ask questions about the thesis itself and the subject matter.

In many schools, master's thesis defenses are restricted to the examinee and the examiners, but doctoral defenses are open to the public. The typical format will see the candidate giving a short 20—minute presentation of their research, followed by one to two hours of questions. At some U.

A student in Russia or Ukraine has to complete a thesis and then defend it in front of their department. Sometimes the defense meeting is made up of the learning institute's professionals and sometimes the students peers are allowed to view or join in. After the presentation and defense of the thesis, the final conclusion of the department should be that none of them have reservations on the content and quality of the thesis. A conclusion on the thesis has to be approved by the rector of the educational institute.

The former Diploma de estudios avanzados DEA lasted two years and candidates were required to complete coursework and demonstrate their ability to research the specific topics they have studied. From on, these courses were replaced by academic Master's programmes that include specific training on epistemology, and scientific methodology.

After its completion, students are able to enroll in a specific PhD programme programa de doctorado and begin a dissertation on a set topic for a maximum time of three years full-time and five years part-time. All students must have a full professor as an academic advisor director de tesis and a tutor, who is usually the same person.

A dissertation tesis doctoral , with an average of pages, is the main requisite along with typically one previously published journal article. Once candidates have published their written dissertations, they will be evaluated by two external academics evaluadores externos and subsequently it is usually exhibited publicly for fifteen natural days. After its approval, candidates must defend publicly their research before a three-member committee tribunal with at least one visiting academic: chair, secretary and member presidente , secretario y vocal.

A typical public Thesis Defence defensa lasts 45 minutes and all attendants holding a doctoral degree are eligible to ask questions. In Hong Kong, Ireland and the United Kingdom, the thesis defense is called a viva voce Latin for "by live voice" examination viva for short.

A typical viva lasts for approximately 3 hours, though there is no formal time limit. Involved in the viva are two examiners and the candidate. Usually, one examiner is an academic from the candidate's own university department but not one of the candidate's supervisors and the other is an external examiner from a different university. We recommend that you make this decision early on in the doctoral process. A monograph is a unified text describing a specialist topic in detail written by a single author.

A doctoral thesis written as a monograph is structured in various chapters with an introduction and a conclusion, and the PhD-candidate is the sole author. Historically, a monograph was the preferred form of doctoral thesis, and it still is in some academic fields. Collection of articles is the most common type of thesis at NTNU today and it is becoming increasingly common in fields that have previously been dominated by the monograph. There are few absolute requirements in the PhD regulations as concerns this kind of thesis and a lot will therefore depend on the individual thesis and the norms in the field as concerns number of articles, length of summary article etc.

When a thesis consists of several shorter papers, the thesis must include clarification concerning how they are interrelated. Such a clarification is often called a summary article. If any of the articles is written in cooperation with others, you must follow the rules and regulations concerning co-authorship. If the thesis mainly consists of articles, you should normally be the main author or first author of at least half the articles.

Your independent contribution should be identifiable. Guidelines for the Assessment of Candidates for Norwegian Doctoral Degrees contains more information on how the assessment committee is to evaluate an article-based thesis. Faculty of Architecture and Fine Art : The thesis may be handed in as a monograph or as a collection of articles.

A collection of articles should contain at least three scientific articles published in international journals. At least one article with the candidate as main or first author should be accepted for publication.

BEST DISSERTATION METHODOLOGY WRITERS SITES CA

I internalize, personalize and then ruminate. But they do brush off set backs and push on. They endure. They get rejections and then keep on applying for things until something eventually sticks. How does one cultivate such a mindset? Any ideas? I know worrying doesn't help, but I really feel like today is the day we'll hear back for this one.

I try to manage my anxiety by having backup plans, and backup plans for my backup plans. I have 3 fellowship apps out, 2 more in the works internal to my uni , a full-time job lined up higher ed but not teaching , summer jobs lined up to hold me over Our proposals are strong. Our dissertations are meaningful. A rejection or acceptance doesn't change the merit of our work. Yet, at the end of the day, one topic might stick out more to a reviewer or reviewers and that's just how the system works.

I've been on the other end of an application process and the faculty member's words resonate for me when I think about that experience — it was so incredibly difficult for me to choose between projects. I applied for four fellowships last year and received two of them.

One is a traveling thing, so of course I have't been able to complete it, but the other was a competitive university-wide fellowship that I was nominated for by my department when I submitted an application for an internal fellowship. Ask for feedback from your advisors and even department graduate advisor or chair throughout the process. A lot of applications won't give you feedback, but always request it. If there is something really wrong, like a bad letter of recommendation, hopefully someone will tell you.

Just having more eyes proofreading your materials will help with that. Then of course there are fit and eligibility—you may not qualify for the award, or your project may not fit the theme or approach that the funders want to support. Feasibility of the project is also huge: the committee might like your proposal but not believe that you will finish in time I'm thinking this will be the main reason I won't be awarded dissertation completion fellowships this year—COVID put a huge wrench in my research schedule.

So you take the feedback you can, apply to as much as possible that you are eligible, and hope for the best. Chance and luck have a lot to do with your success, but you can also improve your chances for future applications by responding to good feedback.

Committees also change every year, so it's a crap shoot whether the people who see your project will be interested in it and your approach or alternately, see it as a threat or incorrect approach to their own research. Question: do your advisors read your applications and give you feedback?

Am I alone on this? I'm in the same boat. I'm sure many others are too, especially this year. This year has been for sure weird and advisors are less available, but they still help me when I ask as long as I give them ample time to respond. May I ask, which disciplines? Do they send all acceptances at the same time? Has anyone received a rejection or alternate notification?

This makes me feel like I'm out of the running Are they sending acceptance emails on a rolling basis or all at the same time? Disappointing news! Congratulations to the awardees, and best of luck to my fellow non-awardees rejects is not the word I want to use here. Better luck next cycle.

That oreo cake sounds ridiculously amazing right now. While we wait for the alternate notifications What counts the most, CV or proposal? It seems incredibly hard to determine which proposal is more worthy out of a pool of hundreds of really qualified and passionate PhD candidates. Just would like to say that, FWIW, I hope everyone who is feeling a bit down today did something else that made them feel worthy.

I mean that in a general sense. Kill it at the gym, make your pet's day and snuggle them they always need you! Self worth shouldn't be tied to 65 seats at a table. I felt pretty down today but had to go to a meeting for my hobby, and someone who has no clue about my day or even my academic self made it a point to shout out my effort in the meeting.

It meant the world to me, because I'm sure I'll get many rejection letters, but I sure as hell don't want to feel like all I have to offer the world is my dissertation project Today, I received a disappointing email for my Charlotte Newcombe application.

My advice is don't ever give up. However—I will be declining. I look forward to someone else getting it! Definitely have to remember that all successes come with a wake of rejections Curious re: poster above, why you might decline? Just nosy, racking my brain and not coming up with many reasons to decline but also holding out a little hope for alternate I'm declining because I've decided to graduate. I got a TT job I didn't want to pass up so I've decided to graduate with the diss as-is.

I hope you get my spot. Good luck! So frustrating! I even tried calling but ACLS is working remotely and the only option is to leave a voicemail. I think if we've not heard anything by this point, we likely are not alternates, unfortunately.

I'm disappointed too, but at least the waiting game is over! IDK, the chances are high that someone on this wiki will be an alternate, so perhaps the notifications didn't go out. I bet they wait for the provisional acceptances to roll in to estimate how many alternates they can inform and then send out notifications. I'm also super bummed about not getting an acceptance, but such is life.

The chapter I submitted wasn't really a chapter If the readers were paying attention they would have noticed this. I also am not sure what my letter-writers wrote about this. So I probably don't deserve the grant anyway.

It was a published journal article based on my first chapter which I adapted to the fellowship formatting style , as I explained in some of my app documents. I thought that would increase my chances since it is shorter than all my chapters which average 60 pages each , self-contained, and would ideally show that I am that advanced in my dissertation that I already published part of it.

I doublechecked with ACLS whether that would be alright or not I have other chapters I could shorten and submit otherwise. I am really almost done with my diss and they told me to go ahead with it. Reading your comment makes me wonder whether that was a wise choice! Argh I feel even more frustrated now! Oh, well since you have most of your other chapters done, then your decision was the right one.

I didn't check with ACLS about it, but I don't have any chapters done, hence why I'm not sure what my letter-writers wrote. I am confident I can finish in a year though, which is why I applied. I remain hopeful ACLS gave accepted applicants ample time to decide on their offer before informing alternates.

Although it seems in previous years, alternates were contacted a day after acceptance letters went out. I guess above poster is right and this year they will wait to estimate how many alternates they can notify. I wish they would just reject whoever is too low in the ranking so that some of us can have some peace of mind.

Maybe they will send out alternates after that? Deadline for accepting the award is officially April 6. And congrats! So I emailed ACLS directly last night and let them know that I was up against a deadline to accept this teaching position and asked if they could give me any details about when I would be notified.

They wrote me back today and said that I wasn't selected. It's unfortunate, but I'm glad that I have a backup and that I now have certainty about what I'm doing next year. I really wish they would just tell us if we did not receive the award and are not alternates. What is the value of making us wait longer? Especially people who did not make it through the first round—I get it if they are waiting to see how many people refuse or are no longer eligible for the award before awarding alternates, but if there are people who aren't in the running at all AAUW lets everyone know on the same day every year.

Wish that was the standard. I agree with you. I emailed them a week ago to ask whether they would be sending alternate notifications this year. They replied to me today to say that I will receive a notification regarding my application's decision in the beginning of April. I think this means that they already know I will not be an alternate and I have to wait to get a rejection letter on April. Why not just a say directly so OR b send an email to anyone who is too low in the ranking so that they can move on?

We were supposed to hear by late March. There are over applicants in the pool for this fellowship. I could have done a better job with the application - no doubt. Still without any news but assuming I'm not a winner nor alternate. I also wish they'd just get it over with and let us know already!

I wonder how many applications to the writing grant visit this page! As someone asked on this wiki last year, why are they making us "stew in our sad rejected juices" for days on end? Send me my rejection already! Please and thank you. I've seen some announcements on Twitter, so I assume I'm out of the running. I do appreciate rejection emails, even just to end the waiting. Wow and no one was checking Wiki this year?

I've seen one mention of someone receiving the award, but mostly just folks assuming they're being rejected since they haven't heard otherwise. Have requested feedback. Plan to share it here and would be great if others who receive feedback could share theirs too.

I think it might help prospective applicants. Congratulations to all those who received this! Due to the number of requests ACLS receives each year, and the work of administering new fellowships each spring, we do not begin processing feedback until the summer, after the competition year is complete. Thank you for your patience. It seems that there's a very small chance I'm an alternate or what's more likely, that they haven't processed all the rejections yet. Some with others I know.

None of us are especially optimistic, but we're all definitely still in limbo. I think it is late though, and the finalists are sworn to secrecy, so they would be unlikely to post here even anonymously. But we can still keep our fingers crossed. Mine says last edited May 1 when I click on preview and it didn't before.

Maybe everyone else has that too. Mine was edited early in the morning like 1am May 1st as well, so imagine whoever was working on them did so into the night. I imagine we'll hear back by Friday at the latest. I just checked the preview and my application was last edited today at AM. Fingers crossed for an update soon! Maybe they emailed people last week who won and are waiting till this week to send out rejections? Really hoping for this week either way, as I have to finalize budgets for fieldwork asap If that were the case, I think someone on here would have posted that they won an award.

I just honestly think it's taking longer. Everything is pushed back by about a week or two, since they pushed back the deadline in January. I've already figured it is a rejection I was lucky to have other fellowships this cycle , but it would be nice to hear either way. Edit: Nevermind, just got the rejection. Good luck to everyone else. Congrats to all who received it!

It seems like last year they notified in April, but this year the date for notification is June. It seems very late! I have another offer that I can accept with another grant, but I don't know if the CMA allows for any funding in addition to their grant. Trying to weigh my options. Told myself July Some other grants allow you to accept multiple ones as long as you aren't double-dipping, like if you got Mellon ACLS and Fulbright you could accept both so long as you didn't use money to pay for the same things i.

Not sure how Graham is though, but I know like Ford and some of the Mellon ones only allow you to accept one, and no teaching or other grad assistantship concurrently. Last year they said April, but I didn't hear until June or July, and I don't think winners and runner ups were announced until September or so.

So I would say that you definitely won't hear before June and will likely not hear until after. Or maybe the timeline is just more realistic this year, and we will hear in June. Hello, You will hear the decision on your application in June if not a little before.

If you are awarded a Carter Manny Award, we are flexible with respect to simultaneously holding other awards. I'd be curious to hear what other's rejection emails sounded like. Awkward email telling me I was a finalist but did not receive a Carter Manny Award or special mention but should consider the Graham Foundation for funding when I publish.

I have not heard anything either. A post suggested their schedule might be disrupted by the inauguration. Maybe something like this is happening right now. Best of luck to you! I would not be surprised if this cycle takes longer. A friend received a call and told me they said some of the committees haven't even met yet because of Covid and the Inauguration, so all calls did not go out at the same time this year as in years past.

Thank you. Someone knows which of the 8 fellowships committees have picked their finalists? Good luck to those who got calls, and condolences to the rest of us! Is anyone holding out hope? Has anyone heard about Wyeth? I would assume they are being done over the course of two days as per years past, though you never know. A diversity of institutions, projects, methods, and backgrounds would be quite welcome.

I hope so as well. The list of previously supported topics and the institutions awardees come from looks like a parody of euro-centric, wealthy, and unaccountable academia. General question since some CASVA fellows include international travel : How many of you would feel comofrtable doing international archive work starting next fall with the pandemic? Wondering if this played a role I was an applicant and haven't received any communication. Can you confirm if notification was emailed? Is anyone else still awaiting notice?

Alternates are usually told by e-mail a few days later with formal letter to follow. I think rejections come by mail, maybe also e-mail. I know it's not rational, but I need the rejection letter to move on to other projects:.

Is there anyone else in the same situation? I know I'm not selected, but this seems later than usual and I'm worried something has gone wrong with my file. Anyone else feel the same way? I want to be able to reach out to my letter-writers, but I don't want to do it before I've heard officially. The only thing wrong with my file is that they didn't pick it!

Can someone say what their rejection letter said? I find the politics of then interesting. Did everyone get the bizarre line about hoping your project will receive future funding? But I wonder why this line implies the politics. I just find it hilarious when they try to say something nice and even address you by name. Good luck, all! I really hope to hear from them in the next couple of hours.

I cannot focus on my writing because of the anxious waiting! Congrats to the finalists! And to my fellow non-finalists: keep strong! You and your research are worth it! I am pleased to inform you that you are among this top group of finalists whose work remains under consideration; 21 Fellows will be chosen in this final round Anyone know how many finalists are chosen?

Email says 21 fellows will be chosen in the final round, but I wonder how many are in the finalist pool? Anyone notice how they extended the deadline at the very last minute? Just saw that today, don't know why I didn't notice it at the time. It made me a bit annoyed, I had to hound one of my letter writers to submit their rec by the deadline I am reapplying for last year.

This year it was crickets. I've also used the Twitter search function and no one has posted that they got it. I can no longer log into my application portal, either that's been true for awhile. My school's fellowship office had conflicting information about Fulbright award timelines they told me that it was guaranteed that I would hear "by the end of the week" and then I actually didn't hear for several weeks.

While I am generally inclined to believe that they have inside scoop, they are also sometimes wrong Anyone have any news on HSS? Based on a deep dive on social media posts over the last few years, I think we can expect to hear back sometime this week. Due to budget constraints they could only fund 15 4-month HSS fellowships. No full-year awardees. I applied for 8 months of support, so that lessens the sting of rejection. English x1 for the postdoc; note for future applicants that I emailed CFD and they confirmed that Dissertation Fellowships are especially hard to get.

I was told the committee meets in April and applicants won't hear back until then. I think my friend was just selected as our institution's preferred candidate or something like that. They posted about it on social media in a way that made it sound like they had received the fellowship.

Email saying that the status has been updated. Checked the portal; found the rejection letter. To clarify, did you apply for the one year research grant or a short term grant? No official letter of acceptance yet but I think this is good news. Best of luck to everyone else! Has anyone else heard from Dartmouth? I applied for the Chavez fellowship. Would have been nice for them to just give me the rejection back in January when they supposedly did interviews. It would be nice to tell us the results in a more straightforward way I just saw it on a common friend's page and that's how I found out.

Given that most applicants are grad students of color, I would hope that they are working toward a more timely notification process Nothing here yet. I've given up sometime last month, but somehow I'm still waiting Best of luck to everyone :.

I've been told about the process by recent Ford awardees and advisors who have served on the panel. It is beyond intense. Each caucus e. That said, I fully expect a rejection soon. Good luck everyone. When I click on it it says "Review results will be available one to two weeks after the review.

Hope it means we'll know something soon! I have "review result" link too, but get the same message when I click. It definitely wasn't there this morning. Hopefully we all hear soon!! It disappeared today though and my application is now current. Anyone have this happen as well?

My "review result" link is still there, but the language has changed a little bit. Now it says "The review is not over. Review results will be available one to two weeks after the review. Might as well say nothing.

Maybe this was their attempt at getting a bit more specific? Did you apply for predoc or dissertation fellowship? I applied for the diss. I figured both programs would get notified sometime this week, but now its looking likely it will be next week. Ahh ok, I applied for the dissertation completion fellowship as well.

I can't help but think that someone out there is tinkering with the link language just to chuckle and watch the panic level on this forum shoot through the roof. I hope not, but academia is a bit of a sadistic game. I hope this doesn't mean we have to wait another week. I need to know something so i can just move on with my life either way!

Scores: Very Good- Excellent in all categories :. There are few absolute requirements in the PhD regulations as concerns this kind of thesis and a lot will therefore depend on the individual thesis and the norms in the field as concerns number of articles, length of summary article etc.

When a thesis consists of several shorter papers, the thesis must include clarification concerning how they are interrelated. Such a clarification is often called a summary article. If any of the articles is written in cooperation with others, you must follow the rules and regulations concerning co-authorship.

If the thesis mainly consists of articles, you should normally be the main author or first author of at least half the articles. Your independent contribution should be identifiable. Guidelines for the Assessment of Candidates for Norwegian Doctoral Degrees contains more information on how the assessment committee is to evaluate an article-based thesis. Faculty of Architecture and Fine Art : The thesis may be handed in as a monograph or as a collection of articles.

A collection of articles should contain at least three scientific articles published in international journals. At least one article with the candidate as main or first author should be accepted for publication. The candidate must be the main or first author of at least two articles. Guidelines for article based theses. Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology : A collection of articles should contain at least three scientific articles in recognized international peer-reviewed journals.

At least one article where the candidate is the main or first author must be accepted for publication. Faculty of Humanities : The Faculty has compiled a set of recommendations for article-based thesis.

Opinion bcg resume tips sorry, that